加州 · 被否決的修訂
哪些修訂被否決，原因何在。
原本會修改《戴維斯-斯特林法》、已在州議會兩院通過、但被州長否決的法案——附州長陳述的理由，全文轉載。
來源 立法顧問辦公室批量公佈數據
範圍 民法典 §§ 4000–6150
會期 2025–2026
這一領域的每家發佈者都會報道哪些法案獲得通過。沒有通過的，則很少有人寫下來，而它往往是更有用的記錄：否決說明是一份經簽署的公開文件，州長在其中說明哪一條規定有問題，以及原本會出什麼問題。董事會在考慮是否修改自己的規則時，從“有人試過，因為這個理由被否決”中學到的，比從又一份已成為法律的法案摘要中學到的更多。
下列條文均未改變。本站有轉載的條文附有鏈接；沒有轉載的，只直接列出條文編號，而不指向一個並不存在的頁面。
AB 2439 2026年10月1日被州長否決
To the Members of the California State Assembly: I am returning Assembly Bill 2439 without my signature. This bill would generally prohibit homeowners associations from restricting a member's use of public streets, establish new notification requirements when the recipient of assessment payments changes, and expand liability for specified violations of assessment-collection procedures. I support protecting homeowners from improper collection practices and ensuring they know where to make their assessment payments. However, this bill would make an association liable for "any costs" a homeowner incurs because the association failed to follow assessment-collection procedures. The bill neither defines nor limits those costs. This broad standard could create uncertainty, invite disputes and litigation, and impose costs on associations and their members disproportionate to the underlying violation. The bill also makes the board liable for a $1,000 civil penalty when an association commits a third specified notice violation within five years. Existing law generally places this type of liability on the association. The bill does not explain how liability against "the board" would operate or how it would apply when board membership changes between violations. This uncertainty could discourage residents from volunteering to serve and make effective association governance more difficult. In addition, the bill requires certificates of mailing and, in certain circumstances, certified mail with a return receipt. These prescriptive requirements could impose substantial administrative costs that would ultimately be passed on to homeowners. For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill. Sincerely, Gavin Newsom
SB 1238 2026年9月24日被州長否決
原擬修訂 § 4525 · § 5200 · § 5510 · § 5550 · § 5551 · § 5560 · § 5565
To the Members of the California State Senate: I am returning Senate Bill 1238 without my signature. This bill would make several changes to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, which governs homeowners associations (HOAs), including establishing a duty of care owed by an HOA's managing agent to both the association and its individual members. A managing agent acts on behalf of the association, while the association owes duties to its members. Establishing a duty owed to both the association and its individual members could create conflicting obligations when a member's interests diverge from those of the community as a whole. The resulting uncertainty could invite litigation, the costs of which homeowners would ultimately bear. This provision also leaves unclear how the new statutory duty of care would interact with a managing agent's existing obligations to the association under common law. Several of the bill's remaining provisions overlap with existing requirements governing reserve planning and homeowners' access to association records, limiting their added benefit. California should improve transparency and accountability in homeowners associations without creating legal uncertainty that could invite litigation and increase costs for homeowners. For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill. Sincerely, Gavin Newsom
否決說明是州長的官方行為，不受版權保護。內容讀取自加州立法顧問辦公室批量發佈資料中的VETO_MESSAGE_TBL，並從同一批資料中讀取每項法案的最後版本，以確認它原本會修訂的條文。檢查日期：2026-10-11。