加州 · 被否决的修订
哪些修订被否决，原因何在。
原本会修改《戴维斯-斯特林法》、已在州议会两院通过、但被州长否决的法案——附州长陈述的理由，全文转载。
来源 立法顾问办公室批量公布数据
范围 民法典 §§ 4000–6150
会期 2025–2026
这一领域的每家发布者都会报道哪些法案获得通过。没有通过的，则很少有人写下来，而它往往是更有用的记录：否决说明是一份经签署的公开文件，州长在其中说明哪一条规定有问题，以及原本会出什么问题。董事会在考虑是否修改自己的规则时，从“有人试过，因为这个理由被否决”中学到的，比从又一份已成为法律的法案摘要中学到的更多。
下列条文均未改变。本站有转载的条文附有链接；没有转载的，只直接列出条文编号，而不指向一个并不存在的页面。
AB 2439 2026年10月1日被州长否决
To the Members of the California State Assembly: I am returning Assembly Bill 2439 without my signature. This bill would generally prohibit homeowners associations from restricting a member's use of public streets, establish new notification requirements when the recipient of assessment payments changes, and expand liability for specified violations of assessment-collection procedures. I support protecting homeowners from improper collection practices and ensuring they know where to make their assessment payments. However, this bill would make an association liable for "any costs" a homeowner incurs because the association failed to follow assessment-collection procedures. The bill neither defines nor limits those costs. This broad standard could create uncertainty, invite disputes and litigation, and impose costs on associations and their members disproportionate to the underlying violation. The bill also makes the board liable for a $1,000 civil penalty when an association commits a third specified notice violation within five years. Existing law generally places this type of liability on the association. The bill does not explain how liability against "the board" would operate or how it would apply when board membership changes between violations. This uncertainty could discourage residents from volunteering to serve and make effective association governance more difficult. In addition, the bill requires certificates of mailing and, in certain circumstances, certified mail with a return receipt. These prescriptive requirements could impose substantial administrative costs that would ultimately be passed on to homeowners. For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill. Sincerely, Gavin Newsom
SB 1238 2026年9月24日被州长否决
原拟修订 § 4525 · § 5200 · § 5510 · § 5550 · § 5551 · § 5560 · § 5565
To the Members of the California State Senate: I am returning Senate Bill 1238 without my signature. This bill would make several changes to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, which governs homeowners associations (HOAs), including establishing a duty of care owed by an HOA's managing agent to both the association and its individual members. A managing agent acts on behalf of the association, while the association owes duties to its members. Establishing a duty owed to both the association and its individual members could create conflicting obligations when a member's interests diverge from those of the community as a whole. The resulting uncertainty could invite litigation, the costs of which homeowners would ultimately bear. This provision also leaves unclear how the new statutory duty of care would interact with a managing agent's existing obligations to the association under common law. Several of the bill's remaining provisions overlap with existing requirements governing reserve planning and homeowners' access to association records, limiting their added benefit. California should improve transparency and accountability in homeowners associations without creating legal uncertainty that could invite litigation and increase costs for homeowners. For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill. Sincerely, Gavin Newsom
否决说明是州长的官方行为，不受版权保护。内容读取自加州立法顾问办公室批量发布资料中的VETO_MESSAGE_TBL，并从同一批资料中读取每项法案的最后版本，以确认它原本会修订的条文。检查日期：2026-10-11。